My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment
>
OnTrack
>
TIA
>
2016
>
TIA 16-7
>
Public Comment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2017 12:30:41 PM
Creation date
1/12/2017 11:35:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
TIA
File Year
16
File Sequence Number
7
Application Name
Amazon Corner
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
1/12/2017
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FODOR & ASSOCIATES LLC <br />Community <br />Planning Consulting <br />To: Erik Berg-Johansen, Associate Planner <br />City of Eugene Planning Division <br />99 West 10th Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />Sent via email attachment to: erik.berg@ci.eugene.or.us <br />Submitted: January 10, 2017 <br />Comments in Response to Supplemental Material for <br />Traffic Impact Analysis, TIA 16- 007, Part 2 <br />The Applicant has submitted new material into the record date December 26, <br />2016 relating to Traffic Impact Analysis, TIA 16- 007. We are submitting these <br />additional comments on behalf of Friends of Eugene in response to the new <br />material. Note that our comments here on the issue of AM peak traffic are in <br />addition to our prior comments submitted into the record on January 6, 2017. <br />Those prior comments related to the AM peak traffic issue are included herein by <br />reference. <br />Threshold for Analysis of AM Peak <br />The Applicant has indicated that the proposed development would generate less <br />than 100 trips during the AM peak hour, and therefore is not required to analyze <br />the morning peak period traffic impacts. This is not the case. The Eugene Code <br />does not state that the 100-trip criteria must be met in the AM peak for the AM <br />peak traffic to be included in the analysis. <br />9.8670 Applicability. Traffic Impact Analysis Review is required when one <br />of the conditions in subsections (1) - (4) of this section exist... <br />(1) The development will generate 100 or more vehicle trips during <br />any peak hour as determined by using the most recent edition of the <br />Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation. <br />394 East 32nd Avenue • Eugene, OR 97405 <br />541/345-8246 • email: info(a)fodorandassociates.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.