My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment
>
OnTrack
>
TIA
>
2016
>
TIA 16-7
>
Public Comment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2017 12:30:41 PM
Creation date
1/12/2017 11:35:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
TIA
File Year
16
File Sequence Number
7
Application Name
Amazon Corner
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
1/12/2017
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
how the traffic analysis for the project has mitigated the increased traffic that the addition of so many people in <br />one small area will create. Given that there will be both residential and commercial uses of the 5-story <br />building I doubt that 160 parking spaces will be adequate. We will find many people parking on these small <br />residential streets. Even as things stand now, crossing Hilyard is a challenge, especially at rush hour. I notice <br />that the traffic study was not done during peak traffic hours. More attention should be paid to the difficulties <br />for motorists at rush hour. <br />Clearly the easiest way to mitigate traffic and congestion issues in a neighborhood is to lower the number of <br />residential units that are added to the mix. I believe that a three-story, mixed use building would better suit the <br />neighborhood conditions as they exist right now. <br />Thank you for you consideration, Kit Kirkpatrick <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.