My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Applicant Response to Public Comment
>
OnTrack
>
TIA
>
2016
>
TIA 16-7
>
Applicant Response to Public Comment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2017 12:27:38 PM
Creation date
1/11/2017 3:53:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
TIA
File Year
16
File Sequence Number
7
Application Name
Amazon Corner
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
1/10/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parking: <br />We believe that adequate parking is essential if the proposed mixed-use project is to be <br />successful and have thoughtfully considered this issue. We currently intend to provide the <br />required minimum parking spaces without taking advantage of allowable reductions offered as a <br />right of development. Further, we are building in future flexibility to add parking capacity in the <br />underground (residential) parking garage by providing space that will accommodate the future <br />addition of car "stackers". Lastly, we are paying particular attention to reinforcing alternative <br />modes of transportation by including specific accommodations to encourage these alternatives. <br />Buildin_q Height / Scale of Protect: <br />This project is not eligible for Multi-Unit Property Tax Exemption (MUPTE) and is entirely <br />privately financed without any public funding sources or grants. In order to secure private <br />financing, the project has to demonstrate viability by meeting specific standards such as Debt <br />Service Coverage Ratio and various other financial-related metrics. Our team has determined, <br />without question, that the project needs to be of a certain critical mass in order to meet the <br />minimum thresholds for these various metrics. This drives the overall height of the building to <br />what is currently proposed. We have considered eliminating the corner plaza space and <br />reducing surface parking in order to enlarge the building footprint to decrease the height, but <br />these measures would seriously compromise the project in other ways and are not enough to be <br />able to reduce the overall building height, As mentioned earlier, a number of alternative <br />development schemes have been considered - some lower and some higher - but those uses <br />seem less compatible for the location than the proposed project. <br />Sincerely, <br />Jonathan P. Lauch <br />Michael P. Coughlin <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.