Laurel Dill Valley Citizens <br />Co-Chairs <br />September 28, 2016 <br />Gunnar Schlieder <br />Mr. Fred Wilson <br />Sheryl Kelly <br />Hearings Official <br />c/o Erik Berg-Johansen <br />Vice-Chair <br />City of Eugene <br />Stephanie Midkiff <br />RE: LHVC SUBMISSION FOR 1ST OPEN RECORD PERIOD, LAUREL RIDGE PUD <br />ZONING REMAND (Z15-0005) <br />Secretary <br />Dear Mr. Wilson: <br />Natalie Whitson <br />I am writing this letter on behalf of the Laurel Hill Valley Citizens as our submission <br />during the I" Open Record period. This submission addresses the short-comings of the <br />applicant's submission from the Hearing on September 21, 2016. <br />Treasurer <br />In short the applicant makes two allegations: <br />Susan Ratzlaff <br />1. The base for LHVC Sheet 9/2/15-04 is a digital copy of the Metro Plan Diagram. <br />2. It is not possible to use more than one referent at a time. <br />Executive <br />Applicant's Allegation l: The LHVC Metro Plan Diagram vs. Applicant's "True <br />Committee <br />Copy" <br />Adam Jones <br />As already presented at the Hearing on September 21, 2016, and corroborated by City <br />Staff, LHVC Sheet 9/2/15-04 is based on a high-resolution scan of a printed copy of the <br />Bill Blix <br />Metro Plan Diagram from a 2004 Metro Plan book. This means that the plan diagram is <br />Betty Hosokawa <br />coeval with the version which was approved by the City Council in 2004. The applicant <br />has not presented any evidence that there is a material difference between the scanned <br />Deborah Kelly <br />diagram used by LHVC to prepare Sheet 9/2/15-04 and the "true copy" applicant obtained <br />Jan Wostmann <br />from the City Recorder. <br />Kathleen Frazer <br />Moreover, as presented by applicant's counsel (Bill Kloos) during the 9/21/16 Hearing, <br />Kaye Downey <br />they borrowed the original ("with its blue cover...") from the City Recorder's office and <br />took it to FedEx/Kinko's to make a scan. This means that applicant's version is also a <br />Mitch Hider <br />"digital copy" of the Metro Plan Diagram! Moreover, it is a very poor quality scan as it <br />Richard Cundiff <br />was apparently copied at the normal scanner resolution. <br />The applicant's surveyor indicates that the base map is "pixelated" and gives an <br />approximate dimension of 15 x 15' per pixel. Closer examination reveals that 10 pixels <br />represent 175' on the applicant's map. Therefore, individual pixels are 17.5' wide. This <br />means that the original 1" = 7000' Metro Plan Diagram was scanned at 400 dpi. <br />Laurel Hi llValleyCitizens@gmaiLcom . 2585Moon Mountain Drive . Eugene, OR 97403 . www.lhvc.org <br />