U, c <br />1 BEFORE THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS <br />t , <br />,E;' 4 « <br />2 OF THE STATE OF OREGON <br />4 CHARLES WIPER, INC., <br />5 Petitioner, <br />6 <br />7 vs. <br />8 <br />9 CITY OF EUGENE, <br />10 Respondent. <br />11 <br />12 LUBA Nos. 2002-131 and 2002-132 <br />13 <br />14 FINAL OPINION <br />15 AND ORDER <br />16 <br />17 Appeal from City of Eugene. <br />18 <br />19 Bill Kloos, Eugenie, filed the petition for review and argued on behalf of petitioner. <br />20 With him on the brief was the Law Office of Bill Kloos, PC. <br />21 <br />22 Emily N. Jerome, Eugene, filed the response brief and argued on behalf of <br />23 respondent. With her on the brief was Harrang Long Gary Rudnick, PC. <br />24 <br />25 BASSHAM, Board Chair; BRIGGS, Board Member; HOLSTUN, Board Member, <br />26 participated in the decision. <br />27 <br />28 REMANDED (LUBA No. 2002-131) 0310312003 <br />29 DISMISSED (LUBA No. 2002-132) 03/03/2003 <br />30 <br />31 You are entitled to judicial review of this Order. Judicial review is governed by the <br />32 provisions of ORS 197.850. <br />Page 1 <br />