Eugene Hearings Official <br />June 29, 2016 <br />Page 11 <br />The same is true for the Greenway permit issued in Exhibit F - a permit for a residence that <br />encroached into the Greenway. WG 08-01. There the dwelling was located partially in the <br />Greenway, even though it could have been moved back out of the Greenway. The focus instead <br />was on the adequacy of the vegetation between the residence and the river. <br />The entirety of the VRI complaint relates to where the proposed use should be located. As <br />explained above, and as exemplified by the recent City decisions, that is the wrong question. <br />The relevant question under this standard is how the Applicant is proposing to treat the area <br />between the improvements and the river. VRI has not taken issue with the plans in that respect. <br />Sincerely, <br />X&" <br />Bill Kloos <br />Cc: Client <br />Michael Connors <br />