My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Appeal Staff Report
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Appeal Staff Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2016 4:01:57 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 1:32:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE TRAILS PUD
Document Type
Appeal Staff Response
Document_Date
1/19/2016
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment E <br />LAW OFFICE OF BILL KLOOS PC <br />OREGON LAND USE LAW <br />375 W. 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 204 <br />EUGENE, OR 97401 <br />TEL: 541.343.8596 <br />WEB: WWW.LANDUSEOREGON.COM <br />December 16, 2015 <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br />c/o Eugene Planning and Development <br />Atrium Building <br />99 West 10th Ave. <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />BILL KLOOS <br />BILLKLOOS@LANDUSEOREGON.COM <br />Re: Chamotee Trails PUD (PDT 15-1/ARA 15-13); <br />Applicant's Appeal of Hearings Official Denial to Planning Commission <br />Dear Commissioners: <br />The proposal is for a 10-lot tentative planned unit development on 5.19 acres in the South Hills, <br />to be processed under the Needed Housing Track in the code and the state law that applies <br />directly to such applications. <br />This appeal incorporates our attached Final Argument to the Hearings Official dated November <br />23. We have also attached a full copy of LUBA's decision in Group B LLC v. City of Corvallis, <br />Or LUBA (August 25, 2015), because it is on point and discussed extensively in the <br />record. It is a good read. <br />References herein to the major documents will be: <br />Applicant Hearing Letter (Nov. 3) <br />Branch Engineering Post-Hearing Letter (Nov. 12) <br />Applicant Final Argument (Nov. 23) <br />Staff Report (Oct. 23) <br />Staff Hearing Memo (Nov 3) <br />Staff Post-Hearing Memo (Nov. 12) <br />City Attorney Memo (Nov. 12) <br />As a final introductory note, the decision of the Hearings Official borrows much text from the <br />Staff Report, and it refers to a "Staff Decision." There is no staff decision, just a Staff Report. <br />The Hearings Official made the initial decision. <br />1. Introduction <br />PC Agenda - Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.