My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Appeal Materials
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Appeal Materials
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2015 4:01:16 PM
Creation date
12/17/2015 9:14:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE
Document Type
Appeal Materials
Document_Date
12/16/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I In sum, Tract B is zoned PD (RS-12) and subject to the 1981 DDP, the <br />2 city may apply any clear and objective planned development standards or <br />3 conditions to the proposed needed housing. However, because the proposal is <br />4 needed housing located on inventoried buildable lands, ORS 197.307(4) <br />5 prohibits the city from applying any unclear or subjective standards or <br />6 conditions to approve or deny the proposed needed housing. Because <br />7 Condition 12 is ambiguous regarding whether any development (including <br />8 needed housing) of Tract B is allowed at all, and is not clear and objective, the <br />9 city cannot apply Condition 12 to prohibit the proposed needed housing, or as a <br />10 vehicle to subject the proposal to subjective approval standards at LDC <br />11 2.5.40.04. <br />12 The first and second assignments of error are sustained. <br />13 THIRD ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR <br />14 As noted, NW Mirador Place was approved as part of the 2006 <br />15 subdivision. As approved and constructed, NW Mirador Place is a cul-de-sac <br />16 that terminates adjacent to Tract B, provides access to Tract B and to <br />17 approximately 17 other lots in the Coronado subdivision, and also includes <br />18 utilities stubbed to Tract B. One basis for denial in the city council's decision <br />19 is noncompliance with LDC 4.0.60.c, which provides in relevant part: <br />20 "Street network plans must provide for connectivity within the <br />21 transportation system to the extent that, generally, both Local <br />22 Connector and Local Streets will be created within a development. <br />23 Identified traffic calming techniques, such as bulbed intersections, <br />24 etc., can reduce traffic speeds and, where included, are to be <br />25 constructed at the time of development. To further address traffic <br />26 speeds and volumes on Local Connector and Local Streets, the <br />27 following street designs, along with other designs intended to <br />28 reduce traffic speeds and volumes, shall be considered: <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.