My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment (8)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Public Comment (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 4:07:00 PM
Creation date
12/4/2015 1:52:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
11/3/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bridal Trail Easement. As described above and shown on the applicant's plan a "Bridal Trail <br />Easement" encumbers the northernmost boundary of the property, between West Amazon <br />Drive and the west property boundary, and then continues southward along the west property <br />boundary to the existing Canyon Drive right-of-way. The terms of the September 3, 1999 <br />Purchase and Sale Agreement ("Agreement") indicate that the Bridal Trail Easement, which is <br />identified as "Parcel E-4" in the Agreement, will be exchanged for an area identified in the <br />Agreement as "Parcel E-3," which coincides with the area shown as the portion of Tract A on <br />the applicant's PUD plans that is south of Senger Lane and Daywood Drive, west of Amazon <br />Drive, and the area bordered by the proposed Canyon Drive extension, east of Amazon Drive. <br />The Agreement stipulates that Parcel E-3 must be conveyed free of certain encumbrances and <br />that, upon conveyance, the City will process (including initiation and payment of related fees) <br />the easement vacation necessary to release the Bridal Trail Easement on Parcel E-4. The <br />applicant's plans do not address the terms of this agreement, yet several lots (Lots 45 through <br />49) intended for residential development are proposed within the Bridal Trail. The above <br />condition of approval addresses the Bridal Trail Easement. <br />EC 9.6505 Improvements -Specifications <br />These standards require all public improvements to be designed and constructed in accordance <br />with adopted plans and policies, the procedures specified in EC Chapter 7, and the standards <br />and specifications adopted pursuant to EC Chapter 7. The applicant proposes public <br />improvements to be privately engineered and constructed. If the application is approved, to <br />ensure compliance with these standards, the following condition of approval is recommended: <br />Public improvements shall be constructed pursuant to EC 9.6505, subject to the design <br />being approved by the City Engineer as part of the Privately Engineered Public <br />Improvement (PEPI) permit process. <br />An Engineering and Construction agreement would be required for the private construction of <br />public improvements, which would need to be submitted when the construction plans are <br />submitted for review and approval. The configuration and size of the public improvements <br />would need to be subject to further approval by the City Engineer upon review of the design <br />and supporting analysis prepared by the applicant's engineer. If the improvements are not <br />permitted prior to plat approval, a bond for the construction of public improvements would <br />need to be provided prior to final plat. In addition, these specifications require all <br />developments to be served by the following infrastructure improvements: <br />(1) Water <br />The applicant's written statement responds to this approval criterion as follows: "See plans for <br />documentation of proposed water service." The applicant's plans show the proposed water <br />system layout on Sheets L11 and L12. The alignment of the water system roughly coincides with <br />the proposed wastewater layout, which is described in greater detail below. Many of the same <br />Hearing Official Decision (PDT 10-2, CU 11-1) 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.