My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment (8)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Public Comment (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 4:07:00 PM
Creation date
12/4/2015 1:52:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
11/3/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EC 9.8305 Applicability. PUD approval is required for the proposed development because the <br />property is zoned with a /PD overlay and because the property has site slopes that exceed 20 <br />percent, between an elevation range of 500 and 701 feet, within the boundary of the South <br />Hills Study. With regard to the /WR Water Resources overlay zone, the applicant states that <br />Standards Review approval will be sought at a later date. <br />EC 9.8310 General Application Requirements. With regard to the ownership requirements of EC <br />9.8310(1), the applicant states that the property west of the West Amazon Drive right-of-way is <br />owned by South Park Associates, LLC and the property east of the right-of-way is owned by <br />West Creek LLC. The applicants, Martin and Leslie Beverly, manage both LLC's. With regard to <br />the project coordinator and professional design team requirements of EC 9.8310(2), the <br />applicant's written statement requests a waiver of the professional design team requirements. <br />EC 9.8310(2)(b) enables the Planning Director to waive any of the professionals listed in this <br />section. Since the relevant approval criteria do not include an evaluation of vegetation, the <br />Planning Director waived the requirement for an arborist. The applicant has not provided, and <br />is not required to provide, conceptual building designs; therefore, the Planning Director also <br />waived the requirement for an architect. The applicant's plans have not been certified by a civil <br />engineer; however, the applicant has submitted a letter regarding the proposed development <br />from Doug Weber, a registered civil engineer. The project team does not appear to include a <br />land surveyor, although survey information has been submitted (as Exhibit A of the application <br />materials). The project coordinator is a landscape architect, Carol Schirmer. Although not <br />required by EC 9.8310(2), the applicant's professional team also includes Bill Kloos, Land Use <br />Attorney. With regard to the phasing requirements at EC 9.8310(3), the application materials <br />indicate that the proposed development will occur as a single phase. The density requirements <br />of EC 9.8310(4) are addressed under the relevant approval criteria later in this report. Finally, <br />with regard to the Needed Housing provision at EC 9.8310(5), the applicant is seeking approval <br />under the Needed Housing criteria, rather than the General criteria. <br />Application Referrals and Public Notice: <br />The application materials confirm compliance with the requirements of EC 9.7005 Pre- <br />application Conference and EC 9.7007 Neighborhood/Applicant Meetings, which were held on <br />December 8, 2011 and January 10, 2012, respectively. Staff clarified the applicant's meeting <br />notes of the pre-application conference in a letter dated December 20, 2011, which is included <br />in the record. <br />The applicant filed the application on March 19, 2012, consistent with EC 9.7010 Application <br />Filing and staff conducted a completeness review of the application materials in accordance <br />with EC 9.7015 Application Completeness Review. The staff completeness review comments, <br />dated April 18, 2012, are included in the record. The applicant submitted revised application <br />materials and exercised its statutory right to require the City to deem the application complete <br />on May 11, 2012. <br />The Eugene Planning Division provided information concerning this tentative PUD application to <br />other appropriate City departments, public agencies, and service providers. Relevant referral <br />Hearing Official Decision (PDT 10-2, CU 11-1) 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.