APP-28 <br />The key finding above is that the development will provide onsite detention, so that <br />the development is not adding stormwater runoff to open waterways. With regard <br />to the onsite waterways, the HO's conclusion that the development does not impact <br />on-site waterways is based on the assumption that the previous criterion at EC <br />9.8325(5), regarding slope, has removed the eastern portion of the site from <br />development. The HO did not evaluate the applicant's.initial 75-lot site plan against <br />the stormwater approval criteria at EC 9.8325(7)0) or EC 9.8325(13); however, the <br />June 21, 2012 staff report provided an analysis and found that the eastern portion of <br />the site did not meet either approval criterion. <br />The topography of the site creates two distinct drainage basins, which coincides with <br />the analysis of the western portion of the site, separate from the eastern portion. <br />The staff analysis of the stormwater development standards at EC 9.6791 through EC <br />9.6797, invoked by criterion EC 9.8325(7)(j) is as follows: <br />Western Drainage Basin <br />The western portion of the site shows a piped stormwater system extended <br />from Martin Street within the proposed streets, with an interconnecting <br />piped system between the streets at the northwest portion of the site, <br />corresponding to gravity drainage and site topography, and involving a piped <br />crossing of the westerly waterway. The proposed stormwater pipes located <br />outside the streets are proposed within public utility easements (PUE). If the <br />Hearings Official ultimately approves the application, the staff <br />recommendations regarding acceptance and determination of the final PUE <br />locations at EC 9.8325(7)(b), as well as waterway crossings and grading <br />restrictions are applicable here, as are staff's proposed conditions regarding <br />compliance with other public improvement standards. <br />The available information indicates that the receiving system has the <br />capacity to accommodate addition runoff from the proposed development.. <br />Staff concurs that the proposed development complies with the stormwater <br />destination standards of EC 9.6791. As noted in the Hydrology Report, a <br />downstream deficiency for the future 10-year storm previously existed at <br />segment 65344 - 66656 in Martin. Street. The completion of Capital Projects <br />AM06A and AM06B under City Project Number 3951 (i.e., City Contract No. <br />2007-09) has corrected these deficiencies. No other downstream deficiencies <br />in the Amazon Channel, which is the receiving system for the proposed <br />development, have been identified for the 10-year design storm, per <br />modeling in the 2002 City of Eugene Stormwater Basin Master Plan, Volume <br />II of VI for the Amazon Basin. <br />Eastern Drainage Basin <br />The applicant has not provided sufficient information regarding the capacity <br />of this drainage basin to accommodate the proposed stormwater runoff from <br />the contributing development along Canyon Drive. The applicant's plans <br />Final Order - Deerbrook PUD (PDT 12-1) December 17, 2012 Page 27 <br />30 <br />