My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment (8)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Public Comment (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 4:07:00 PM
Creation date
12/4/2015 1:52:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
11/3/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Susan Muir <br />May 17, 2004 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />With that as background, my client would suggest that the provision must allow streets within the <br />30-foot landscape along the perimeter. This is so because any development site needs to be <br />accessed by a street or streets. To say that the criteria above does not allow streets in the 30 foot <br />wide landscape area would be to say that the site can't be developed. <br />Similarly, the allowance of streets in the landscape area should not be subject to any limitations <br />on how much of the 30-foot perimeter area may be occupied by streets. To do so would require <br />the exercise of judgment, which would make the criteria discretionary in nature, not clear and <br />objective. <br />Similarly, the criteria should not be read as prohibiting the placement of fences in the 30-foot <br />area, as there is no prohibition against fencing in connection with the criteria. <br />Sincer , <br />I <br />Klo <br />cc: Client <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.