My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment (8)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Public Comment (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 4:07:00 PM
Creation date
12/4/2015 1:52:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
11/3/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commentary <br />Planned Unit Development, Tentative Plan <br />9.8300 Purpose of Planned Unit Development. <br />Based on existing EC 9.508 Purpose. Draft changed to clarify that PUD process is designed to <br />provide a high degree of flexibility to achieve resource protection, mix of uses, shared use of <br />facilities and other objectives. <br />9.8305 Applicability. <br />Based on existing EC 9.509 Applicability. Draft code deletes existing reference to uses which <br />were approved prior to the adoption of PUD provisions in 1968, but not yet developed. This <br />statement no longer appears necessary. Draft code clarifies that property owner may choose to <br />have proposed development reviewed through the PUD process even if the property is not <br />specifically zoned with the /PD overlay or required to go through the PUD process due to a <br />refinement plan policy. <br />9.8310 Tentative Planned Unit Development General Application Requirements. <br />(1) Ownership <br />Based on existing EC 9.510(1) Ownership. This section is modified to require that PUD's <br />include all contiguous property under the same ownership consistent with partition and <br />subdivision applications. Also provides clarification regarding "contiguous" parcels to allow <br />parcels separated by a public right-of-way to be included in the same PUD application. <br />(2) Project Coordinator and Design Team <br />Based on existing EC 9.510(8) Professional Coordinator and Design Team. Section changed to <br />focus on key issues. Revised language no longer requires project coordinator to maintain a Lane <br />County address. Added requirement that an arborist participate on the Design Team. <br />1118199 Commentary Page 9,8-14 0 0 O 0 Zj2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.