My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Report (Hearings Official)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Staff Report (Hearings Official)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 4:08:07 PM
Creation date
12/4/2015 12:48:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE
Document Type
Staff Report
Document_Date
11/4/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
discusses fire safety and egress issues, the proposed "detention facility" for stormwater, the Vivian Drive <br />right-of-way, and the proposed pump system for sewage. He also states that the applicant assured him . <br />that future homes on the lots adjacent to Vivian Drive will be constructed toward the uphill side of each <br />lot, but that he would like further assurance that this will be implemented. Finally, he states that he does <br />not oppose the proposal in general, but believes there should be various conditions of approval to address <br />the issues specified in his letter. <br />No other testimony has been received as of the publication of this staff report. Any testimony received <br />following the completion of this staff report, and prior to the public hearing, will be presented to the <br />Hearings Official at the hearing. <br />The Planning Division also provided information concerning the application to other appropriate City and <br />County departments, public agencies, service providers, and the affected neighborhood group. All referral <br />comments received by the Planning Division on this application are included in the application file for <br />reference, and addressed in the context of applicable tentative PUD approval criteria and standards in the <br />following evaluation. <br />Staff Evaluation <br />The general application requirements are established at Eugene Code (EC) 9.7000 through EC 9.7030. The <br />Type III procedures apply to the concurrent applications for tentative PUD and Adjustment Review, which <br />are provided at EC 9.7300 through EC 9.7340. Application requirements specific to the tentative PUD are <br />listed at EC 9.8310. The relevant approval criteria for the applicant's proposal under Needed Housing <br />criteria are addressed at EC 9.8325. <br />Consistent with EC 9.7005 Pre-application Conference, the applicant met with staff in April of 2014 (PC 14- <br />20). The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on January 27, 2015, in compliance with EC 9.7007 <br />Neighborhood/Applicant Meetings. With regard to EC 9.8310 Tentative Planned Unit Development <br />Needed Housing Application Requirements, the applicant indicates that the proposed PUD includes all <br />property under contiguous ownership. <br />As required by the Type III land use application procedures beginning at EC 9.7300, the Hearings Official <br />must review any PUD application and consider pertinent evidence and testimony as to whether the <br />proposed use is consistent with the criteria required for approval (shown below in bold typeface). Based <br />on the evidence available as of the date of this staff report, the following findings and a recommendation <br />for denial of the tentative PUD are presented below. <br />EC 9.8325(1): The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed housing is needed housing as <br />defined by State statutes. <br />Oregon Revised Statutes define needed housing as follows: <br />197.303 "Needed housing" defined. (1) As used in ORS 197.307, until the beginning of the <br />first periodic review of a local government's acknowledged comprehensive plan, "needed <br />housing" means housing types determined to meet the need shown for housing within an <br />urban growth boundary at particular price ranges and rent levels. On and after the <br />Staff Report (PDT 15-1/ARA 15-13) October 2015 <br />HO Agenda - Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.