Because the first best Haven meeting held on January 14, 2015, was not a bona fide <br />Neighborhood/Applicant meeting, the Applicant should not have submitted an application for a <br />Metro Flan amendment and zone change for Rest Haven. As stated in EC 9.7007(2): <br />"Prior to the submittal of an application listed in subsection (1) above, the applicant shall host a <br />meeting for the surrounding property owners". <br />With complete disregard o C 9.7007(2), the Applicant submitted his application o <br />January 16, 2015. Based on EC 9.7007 (2), the Applicant's application, the only one <br />submitted, is not valid. <br />The Applicant held a Neighborhood/Applicant meeting on February 18, 2015. In spite of the <br />letter from Gabe Flock to Carol Schirmer (see above) where Mr. Flock states: <br />" As part of a complete application, you will need to provide evidence and should also discuss <br />compliance with requirements of EC 9.7007 in your written statement", <br />the Applicant appears to not have complied with EC 9.7007(4) and EC 9.7007(5)(a)(b)2 once <br />again. With respect to the Neighborhood/Applicant meeting on February 18, 2015, did the <br />Applicant comply with appropriate Eugene Codes? Consistent with the content of Mr. Flock's <br />statement (see above): <br />If the Applicant cannot produce a valid receipt for a registered or certified ailing to the <br />Southeast Neighbors and cannot produce documentation of a discussion about when the <br />Neighborhood/Applicant meeting was to be held, the Applicant was not in compliance with <br />EC 9.7007(4). <br />If the Applicant cannot produce documentation that Crest Drive Citizens Association was <br />not notified about the Neighborhood/Applicant meeting, the Applicant was not in <br />compliance with EC 9.7007(5)(a)(b)2. <br />As stated in "Ordinance with Exhibits" in the public record (document date 9/11/2015): <br />"The City of Eugene land use code implements Statewide Planning (foal 1 by requiring that <br />notice of the proposed amendment be given and public hearings be held prior to adoption. <br />Consideration of the amendment begins with a City of Eugene Planning Commission public <br />hearing on July 14, 2015. The applicant also held a neighborhood meeting which was noticed to <br />the affected neighborhood organization and property owners and residents within 300 feet of the <br />subject property, per EC 9.7007". <br />