16. , The proposed use was consistent with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring urban <br />levels of development within the urban growth boundary. <br />17. The City of Eugene indicated that the required services outlined in Metro Plan policy 48, <br />page II-C-4 and defined on page V-3, were either available or could be provided in a <br />timely manner. <br />18. This request was consistent with this standard. <br />Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and <br />projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and <br />199.462(1) <br />19. The modified annexation proposal was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an <br />incremental step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth <br />boundary, land uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future <br />needs of the metropolitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long- <br />range plan for the area. The annexation of territory to the city fulfills the policies in the <br />Metro Plan of annexing out to the urban growth boundary. <br />20. This request was consistent with this standard. <br />Reasons: <br />1. The proposal was supported by the City of Eugene and the property owners. <br />2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan. <br />3. The services required in the Metro Plan were either available or could be provided in a <br />timely manner when needed. <br />4. The proposal was consistent with past boundary commission actions supporting <br />annexation of territory to the City of Eugene. <br />5. The modified proposal was consistent with boundary commission administrative rule <br />policies. <br />PI: LCBC: LABC\SNA20071CEU07.?7 SN 10.4.07:DOC <br />Last Soved. September 28, 2007 <br />LCLGBC Staff Notes (c eu o7 - 37) - October 4, 2007 <br />Page 1V-A-]0 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 1080 <br />