My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 Public Record Pages 1021-1272
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2015
>
Z 15-5
>
06 Public Record Pages 1021-1272
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2015 4:44:44 PM
Creation date
10/23/2015 2:14:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
LAUREL RIDGE
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
10/23/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Z 97-30): The property was rezoned from AG Agricultural to R1/PD Low Density Residential District <br />with Planned Unit Development Subdistrict following annexation. <br />(PDT 01-1): The Hearings Official granted tentative plan PUD approval for Myss PUD, which was a <br />proposal for 16 single-family residential lots and associated infrastructure.2 The,approval has since <br />expired. <br />(Z 05-8): The /WR Water Resources Conservation-overlay was attached to the subject property as part <br />of the Goal 5 Natural Resources Conservation Project. <br />(CI 07-3): The Hearings Official issued a code interpretation on appeal regarding the interpretation <br />regarding the component features of the /WR conservation area on the subject property. <br />Description of Planned Unit Development and Standards Review Requests <br />The present request is for planned unit development approval for a single phase subdivision with 17 <br />single-family residential lots, a conservation tract, public streets for internal circulation, and associated <br />infrastructure, including a driveway crossing over the Gilliam Creek channel. The proposed lots range <br />from 4,500 to 12,055 square feet in size, with the two largest lots (lots 5 and 6) and proposed lots 4 <br />and 7, encumbered by resource conservation setbacks. The applicant proposes to place structural fill <br />and grade the property outside of the conservation area boundaries, and install a 16-inch high keystone <br />wall to delineate the developable areas from the nondevelopable conservation areas. The applicant <br />originally proposed to install drywells on lots 4 through 7, but when the applicant was notified that <br />drywells are not appropriate, the applicant revised the proposal to provide soakage trenches on lots 5 <br />and 6 and connect the other lots to the general stormwater collection system. The applicant is seeking <br />flexibility through the PUD process to modify front yard setback standards for Lots 1-4 and lot <br />frontage standards for Lots 5 and 6 (the westernmost lots). In addition, the applicant seeks SDR <br />approval for the proposed culvert driveway and utility crossing to serve Lots 5 and 6, stormwater <br />discharge from Sterling Woods Drive into an existing outfall southeast of the site, and removal of a <br />berm (that forms the upper bank of eastern arm of the riparian corridor) within the regulated /WR <br />conservation area. <br />Access is proposed via a street connection to Sterling Woods Drive to the south and to Gilliam Road to <br />the east, with two street stubs to the north proposed to provide future access. <br />In a staff report dated May 6, 2008, staff recommended denial of the application, concluding that the <br />applicant had failed to demonstrate that the proposal is consistent with Metro Plan policies, applicable <br />policies found in the Willakenzie Area Plan and the Goal 5 Resource Plan, the city's /WR overlay <br />provisions and its stormwater drainage standards. Primarily staff objected to the paucity'of evidence <br />supplied by the applicant, noting that until the city received evidence that the applicant's proposal is <br />consistent with development standards, the city does not have a basis to recommend approval. <br />Evaluation <br />The Hearings Official shall approve, approve with conditions,, or deny a tentative PUD application <br />based on criteria set out in Eugene Code (EC) 9.8320. The applicant is also requesting Standards <br />Review (SDR) approval pursuant to EC 9.8470 to install utilities and a culverted driveway within the <br />2 According to the applicant, the proposed development is very similar to the development approved PDT 01-1 While that <br />may be true, the standards used to evaluate planned unit developments have changed significantly For example, the code <br />now requires that the proposal be consistent with adopted policies of the Metro Plan, includes new standards for identifying <br />protected riparian resources and includes new standards for stormwater detention and drainage <br />Alder Woods PUD (PDT 07-5 & SDR 08-2) Page 3 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 1131 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.