My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05 Public Record Pages 824-1020
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2015
>
Z 15-5
>
05 Public Record Pages 824-1020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2015 4:35:39 PM
Creation date
10/23/2015 1:31:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
LAUREL RIDGE
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
10/23/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P®F Page 54 <br />PUD approval is required for the proposed development based on applicability provisions at EC <br />9.8305(1) and (3). In addition to the South Hills Study requirements, the proposal for multi- <br />family residential and neighborhood commercial uses is also subject to PUD approval in the R-1 <br />zone, according to EC Table 9.2740, <br />The applicant's final narrative in support of the tentative planned unit development is 74 pages <br />(plus exhibits) and dated June 24, 2013. The tentative planned unit development standards are <br />addressed beginning at page 19. There is a 38 page Staff Report recommending denial of the <br />requested tentative planned unit development. <br />Six different Site Plans were submitted at the August 28 hearing. The Sixth Plan is the subject of <br />the Final Staff Report. As explained at the hearing, staff was unwilling to support any of the <br />alternatives. The record shows the following submissions and vetting: <br />Title <br />Shared <br />Submitted <br />Discussed <br />Multi- <br />Single <br />Total <br />Open <br />w/neighbors <br />to city <br />w/staff <br />family <br />Family <br />Units <br />Space <br />Units <br />Units <br />First <br />March 2012 <br />348 <br />239 <br />587 <br />49.44 <br />Plan <br />acres or <br />39.1%' <br />Second <br />May 2012 <br />June 2012 <br />408 <br />200 <br />608 <br />64.23 <br />Plan <br />acres or <br />52.8% <br />Third <br />July 2012 <br />August <br />'408 <br />200 <br />608 <br />54.20 <br />Plan <br />2012 <br />acres or <br />44.5% <br />Fourth <br />September <br />608 <br />0 <br />608 <br />89.41 <br />Plan <br />2012 <br />acres or <br />73.5% <br />Fifth <br />January <br />538 <br />70 <br />608 <br />71.31 <br />Plan <br />2013 <br />acres or <br />58.5% <br />Sixth <br />June 2013 <br />533 <br />75 <br />608 <br />76.95 <br />Plan <br />acres or <br />63.2% <br />The criteria for Tentative PUD approval are addressed below. <br />9.83201: The PUD is consistent with applicable adopted policies of the Metro Plan. <br />LaurelRidge Applicant Final Argument - Page 20 <br />103 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 858 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.