PDF Page 44 <br />The subject property was not.annexed until 2007, at which time the line marking the <br />UGB at this location was reduced to a metes and bounds description along the south <br />and east boundary of the subject property. See Boundary Commission Final Order, C EU <br />07-37 (Oct. 4, 2007) Exhibit A (metes and bounds) and Exhibit B (map), submitted as <br />Applicant Prehearing Exhibit 1-1.1. <br />The Boundary Commission set the exact location of the UGB after agreement <br />among the city, the county, and the property owner. See Boundary Commission <br />Staff Report, C EU 07-37 (Oct. 4, 2007) at 2 para 4, submitted as Applicant <br />Prehearing Exhibit 1-1.2. <br />The Boundary Commission found the plan designation is LDR. ('The land use <br />designation for the annexation area was low-density residential in the Eugene <br />Springfield Metropolitan Area Plan (Metro Plan).") See Boundary Commission <br />Final Order, C EU 07-37 (Oct. 4, 2007) Exhibit C Finding 5, submitted as Applicant <br />Prehearing Exhibit 1-1.1. <br />The Staff Report to the Boundary Commission in support of the annexation <br />stated that the subject property is MDR. See Boundary Commission Staff Report, <br />C EU 07-37 (Oct. 4, 2007) at 3 para 3, submitted as Applicant's Pre-hearing <br />Exhibit 1-1.2. <br />Based on the above, it is clearthat the UGB line on the current Metro Plan <br />Diagram does not reflect the actual footprint of the UGB at this location. That is <br />in the annexation order. <br />The Laurel Hills Refinement Plan (1982) was adopted by Res. No. 3700 (July 26, 1982). <br />The applicant placed a full copy in the record at the hearing (Exhibit 3). Section 2 says- <br />that "[t)he land Use Diagram included in the Laurel Hill Plan Update is hereby adopted <br />as a refinement of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan diagram." <br />The plan map included in the refinement plan shows the LDR plan designation extending <br />south to the UGB line. <br />Based on the facts above, the plan designation for the entire property is LDR. In this instance <br />the Metro Plan Diagram is not parcel specific. The Metro Plan Diagram is made more specific <br />by the refinement plan, which indicates the LDR designation extends to the UGB. The exact <br />location of the UGB was fixed at annexation; all of the subject property is inside the UGB. <br />This conclusion is supported by the relevant caselaw resolving the relationship between the <br />Metro Plan Diagram, in situations where it is generalized, and a more specific refinement plan. <br />The principal cases are Carlson and Knutson, referenced above. Carlson was a zone change <br />from R-1 to R-2. The Metro Plan Diagram, drawn at a 1:8000 scale, showed the area to be <br />Laurel Ridge Applicant Final Argument - Page 10 <br />93 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 848 <br />