05 Public Record Pages 824-1020 - Laserfiche WebLink

PDF Page 38 Because the development proposal hinges on the zone change; that application is addressed first below. Application History/Procedural Summary: The Staff Report provides the following summary (beginning at Page 15): Pre-Application Conference and Neighborhood /Applicant Meetin The applicant held a required Pre-Application Conference (PC 12-12) with City staff on March 9th 2012. See EC 9.7005. The applicant also held a Neighborhood/Applicant Meeting as required by EC 9.7007. The applicant's development proposal which was the-subject of these initial meetings included 408 multi-family units and 200 single family lots. Based on completeness review comments from City staff, the applicant revised the application and re-submitted on July 31, 2012 (the revised submittal at that time still included 408 multi-family units and 200 single family lots). Subsequently, the applicant revised the application again to include 538 multi-family units and 70 single family lots, and held another neighborhood applicant meeting on January 31, 2013. After some additional revisions, the applicant submitted the most recent application materials on June 31, 2013. The current plan, subject to evaluation below, includes a total of 533 multi-family units and 75 lots. Completeness Review, Referrals and Public Hearin; Notice The concurrent land use applications for Laurel Ridge PUD were deemed complete on November 9, 2012, at the applicant's request under the statutory allowance for doing so under ORS 227.178. The applicant also provided a series of time extensions under the state's mandated 120-day time limit for a final local decision (the "120-day rule"), in order to provide a variety of revisions to the concurrent applications included in this request and to attempt to provide some of the missing information identified by the City as part of completeness review. The applicant has extended the 120-day limit a total of 220 days (a maximum of 245 days may be granted) making October 15, 2013 the 120th day under the rule. Between March 2012 and June 2013 the Applicant submitted, and reviewed with city staff, six different site plans. These were submitted as a Hearing Exhibit (Exhibit 10) as a package. The First Plan (March 2012) showed 587 units, including 348 multi-family and 239 single family, with 39.1% open space. The Second Plan (May 2012) showed 608 units, including 408 multi-family and 200 single family, with 52.8% open space. This was discussed with staff in June 2012. The second plan differed from the first in that street locations were modified to lessen cut LaurelRidge Applicant Final Argument - Page 4 87 Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 842