BERG-JOHANSEN Erik <br />From: Gunnar Schlieder <gunnar@geoscience-or.com> <br />Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:27 PM <br />To: BERG-JOHANSEN Erik; Bill Blix; WOSTMANN Jan (SMTP); Stephanie Midkiff; CLINGMAN <br />Bill W <br />Subject: One more measurement <br />Follow Up Flag: Follow up <br />Flag Status: Flagged <br />All: So I figured I'd go to the original 2004 Metro Plan copy (11 x 17) that is in the applicant's <br />submission as Exhibit C. It's a 13.3 Meg PDF, so is sort of medium resolution. I measured the width <br />of the black lines of the streets in the Downtown Grid after zooming in to the image to 500% (to get a <br />measurable width). All black lines denoting streets in that small area are the same - 0.006", which, at <br />the 1" = 7,000' scale (it is - I checked) translates to 42'. Given that the tax lot map indicates that the <br />R-o-W in that area is 66 feet, the 42' wide black lines on the Metro Plan have a maximum of 24 feet <br />of "wiggle room", assuming that the diagram is properly fitted to the tax lot map. This is significantly <br />less than the 179' that the applicant moved the tax lot map relative to the Metro Plan Diagram from <br />where LCOG places it. Just wanted to throw that out there. <br />Cheers <br />Gunnar <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 994 <br />