August 28, 2015 <br />Received Ill j'ublj1✓ Flea Iflg <br />LAURELRIDGE <br />My of Eugene Planning & Development <br />:one Change Application <br />AUG 2 6 2015 <br />File Number Z 15-5 <br />Hearing Official Public Hearing <br />File 7f: Z <br />APPLICANT TESTIMONY <br />I xilibll Ff; k <br />1. Opening Remarks. <br />1. Hello and Introductions. <br />2. We would like to thank staff for their assistance in processing our application. <br />3. As for staff's recommendation of approval, <br />let's review a few highlights from their staff report. <br />II. Staff Report. <br />1. Staff points out, that in the applicant's previous zone change application for the subject <br />property, LUBA affirmed the Hearings Official and Planning Commission decisions and <br />confirmed the following important findings: <br />1. The POS designation is clearly shown on a portion of the subject site; <br />2. The Metro Plan diagram takes precedence over the Laurel Hill Refinement Plan map; <br />1 The UGB and East 301h Avenue right-of-way are appropriate referents in determining <br />the correct location for POS designation. <br />In that regard, the applicant generated the application before you this evening. Let's take a <br />look at how the application complies with applicable criteria. <br />EC 9.8865(1): The proposed zone change is consistent with applicable provisions of <br />the Metro Plan. The written text of the Metro Plan shall take precedence over the Metro <br />Plan diagram where apparent conflicts or inconsistencies exist. <br />Metro Plan Diagram <br />1. As staff notes: "The question before the Hearings Official is whether the applicant has <br />provided reliable, relevant and credible evidence that supports their proposed zoning <br />configuration. " (Staff Report page 3, HO Agenda page 17, last para.) <br />2. As LUBA said in their decision: "It may be possible to scale up the digital version of the <br />map, overlay it with property lines from a digital database, and determine the precise <br />plan designation boundaries on the subject property with reasonable accuracy" (Staff <br />Report page 4, HO Agenda page 18, first para.) <br />3. Well...the applicant has done just that. <br />4. Consistent with LUBA's findings, we scaled up the Metro Plan diagram, employed the <br />aforementioned referents and aligned the Metro Plan diagram with the subject <br />property's boundary survey. <br />5. We did this using the referents as follows: <br />Referent #1 - 30th Avenue: We followed the suggestion of LUBA and scaled up the <br />2004 Diagram and registered it with the subject property. How'd we do that? Well: <br />a. On the Metro Plan diagram, 30th Avenue is a single black line. <br />b. We knew that the black line was representing 301" Avenue (and not <br />its variable width right-of-way or anything else) just as other <br />primary roadways are shown as single black lines (and nothing <br />else) on the diagram. <br />c. Thus, our challenge was to align the subject property in relation to <br />the black line. <br />d. The black line has been in the same location on the diagram since <br />the diagram's inception in 1982. N <br />.p M[)SCAPE AACMIECTS f <br />375 West 4th, 5uile 201, Eugenie, OH 97401 SCHIRMER <br />PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS Pllone: 541.686.4540 f ax' 5,11 _686.4577 <br />ww,v- sc h it n le rs a t re.-coin SAIREN <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 795 <br />