My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03 Public Record Pages 413-612
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2015
>
Z 15-5
>
03 Public Record Pages 413-612
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2015 4:23:18 PM
Creation date
10/23/2015 1:30:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
LAUREL RIDGE
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
10/23/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT R Page 150 <br />1. Historic Preservation Element <br />The metropolitan area has experienced, and it appears will continue to experience, growth and <br />change. On the other hand, public interest and commitment to historic preservation has been <br />increasing, at least partly due to recognition that historic structures, sites, and areas which <br />provide a tangible physical connection with the past are a nonrenewable resource. This link with <br />previous times provides a sense of permanence, continuity, and perspective to our lives, as well <br />as a context within which change occurs. Historic structures can enrich our lives by offering <br />architectural diversity to the visual environment and provide tangible links to the future. <br />Goal <br />Preserve and restore reminders of our origin and historic development as links between oast, <br />resenand_future generations. <br />Findings, Objectives, and Policies <br />Findings <br />1. Programs and publications that identify sites, structures, objects, and cultural areas and <br />activities of historic significance serve as a visual and educational experience for the <br />public. <br />2. Structures and sites of historic significance contribute to an area's ability to attract <br />tourism. <br />The metropolitan area has an important heritage of historic sites, structures, and objects <br />worthy of preservation. <br />4. When positive measures are not taken, visible evidence of ties to the past and reminders <br />of our heritage disappear. <br />5. To • ^ degrees, Springfield, Lane County, and Eugene are eurrently designing an <br />implementing programs of historic preservation and awareness. <br />6. While sever-a! ar-ehaeologieal sites are leeated in the met-opellitan area, the value and <br />^nifieanee of only e e has been aetefmi °a. There remain many sections of the <br />metropolitan area in which no surveying has been done to locate historic and <br />archaeological sites. <br />7. Historic preservation programs generally allow continued and changing occupancy of <br />historic structures and sites. <br />8. Beginning with the Antiquities Act of 1906 and through.the present time, both the federal <br />and Oregon state governments have expressed an interest in and enacted laws providing <br />1 A R III-I- I <br />4a,§el Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 469 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.