My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03 Public Record Pages 413-612
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2015
>
Z 15-5
>
03 Public Record Pages 413-612
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2015 4:23:18 PM
Creation date
10/23/2015 1:30:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
LAUREL RIDGE
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
10/23/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBITS Page 13 <br />Each city is taking a different a proach to, and is on a different time line for, establishing its own <br />UGB, 20-,year land supply and city-specific comprehensive land use Plans. As this incremental <br />shift occurs, the Metro Plan will be amended several times to reflect the evolving extent to <br />which it continues to ably to each jurisdiction. During this transition, the three jurisdictions <br />will also continue to work together on any other Metro Plan amendments needed to carry out <br />planning responsibilities that continue to be addressed on a regional basis. <br />ORS 197.304 allows the cities to adopt local plans that supplant the regional nature of the Metro <br />Plan "fnlnotwithstandin4 acknowledged comprehensive Plan provisions to the contrary." As <br />these local plans are adopted, Eugene, Springfield and Lane County wish to maintain the Metro <br />Plan as a guide that will direct readers to a plicable local plan(s) when Metro Plan provisions no <br />longer apply to one or more of the jurisdictions. Therefore, when Eugene or Springfield adopts a <br />city-specific plan to independently address a planning responsibility that was previously <br />addressed on a regional basis in the Metro Plan, that city will also amend the Metro Plan to <br />specify which particular provisions of the Metro Plan will cease to ably within that city_2 <br />Unless the Metro Plan provides otherwise, such Metro Plan provisions will continue to 0121 <br />y <br />within the other city. If the other city later adopts its own city-specific plan intended to supplant <br />the same Metro Plan provisions, it may take one of two actions. That city will either amend the <br />Metro Plan to specify that the particular provisions also cease to ably within that city or, if the <br />provisions do not ably to rural or urbanizable areas within the Metro Plan boundary, to simplly_ <br />delete those particular Metro Plan provisions. <br />To better enable the jurisdictions to amend the Metro Plan as required by ORS 197.304, the <br />procedures for amending the Metro Plan, provided in Chapter IV, were revised in 2013. The <br />Eugene y Council, the Springfield City Council, and the Lane County Board of <br />Commissioners adopted identical amendments to Chapter IV of the Metro Plan on November 18, <br />2013: <br />Eugene y Council, Ordinance No. 6304 <br />Springfield City Council, Ordinance No. 20519 <br />Lane County Board of Commissioners, Ordinance No. PA 1300 <br />' As more specifically explained in Chapter IV of the Metro Plan, one city with co-adoption by <br />Lane County may amend the Metro Plan to specify which particular Metro Plan provisions no <br />longer ably within the unincorporated (urbanizable) portions of its UGB. The other city is not <br />required to co-adopt such a Metro Plan amendment. See Chapter IV. <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 576 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.