Mr. Fred Wilson <br />September 2, 2015 <br />Page 4 <br />The statute can be accessed at the following URL: <br />http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/93.312 <br />Conclusions <br />The attached maps, prepared by LHVC, show unequivocally that excellent registration <br />can be achieved using the Applicant's own materials, which Applicant insisted were <br />either based on actual survey data, or scanned from an original copy of the Metro Plan <br />Diagram. This registration requires a 20 clockwise rotation of the applicant's surveyed <br />map of the property and accompanying 30th-Avenue centerline "referent". The <br />relationship of the property's boundaries to the Zoning Designations on the Metro Plan <br />Diagram map is then for all practical purposes identical to Applicant's Sheet SA 7.0 from <br />the previous application (on which all layers are, however, oriented to True North). <br />Recommendation <br />Laurel Hill Valley Citizens strongly recommends rejection of the applicant's version of <br />the overlay of the property onto the Metro Plan Diagram (Applicant's Sheet ZC-4). In <br />addition to the obvious errors on ZC-4 pointed out by LHVC, we have submitted several <br />more accurate registrations of the property, both on the applicant's scan of the Metro <br />Plan Diagram, and on an independently scanned version. The application should be <br />denied on the basis of not being consistent with the Metro Plan Diagram, thus failing to <br />meet approval criterion EC 9.8865(1). <br />Alternatively, the application could be amended by the applicant by substituting a map <br />with better registration for the Applicant's Sheet ZC-4. Ideally, this new map would be <br />verified by an independent entity such as LCOG. <br />Sincerely, T <br />_ DREG <br />~yGunnar Schlieder, Ph.D., CEG' 3339 A. <br />Jan Wostmann <br />Co-Chairs, Laurel Hill Valley Citizens <br />Att: LHVC Sheets 9/2/15-01 through -05 <br />Expires 12/31/2015 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 83 <br />