01 Public Record Pages 1-204 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Fred Wilson September 16, 2015 Page 5 designations are depicted over a single-line representation of major streets and roads." (c) The governing bodies in 2014 confirmed the primacy of the 2004 printed Diagram when they almost goofed in the HB 3337 amendments. Recently, in Metro Plan amendments to effectuate the HB 3337 split, the three governing bodies affirmed the primacy of the 2004 printed Diagram as the only legitimate Metro Plan Diagram. The applicant alluded to this at the hearing, and then submitted documentation during the open record period. In November 2014 the three governing bodies adopted identical amendments to the Metro Plan intended to facilitate the transition to separate UGBs. The county ordinance was PA 1313 (Nov. 12, 2014). It has been submitted post-hearing as part of Exhibit S at page 4. The Joint Planning Commissions met on the matter on October 23, 2014. Their approved minutes have been submitted as part of Exhibit S at page 182. The minutes reflect that the draft ordinance included, in addition to the plan text amendments, a Metro Plan Diagram. The minutes reflect submission of testimony by Bill Kloos, on behalf of Environ-Metal, objecting to the Diagram, because it differed from the 2004 Metro Plan Diagram in material respects, including relating to the Environ-Metal property. The Kloos letter of testimony has been submitted as part of Exhibit S at page 189. The material part of the minutes says: "Bill Kloos, Oregon Land Use Law, Eugene, spoke on behalf of his client Environ-Metal Products, LLC. He noted he had submitted a letter dated October 22, 2014, to the Joint Planning Commission setting forth his concerns regarding the Metro Plan enabling amendments. He said the proposed Metro Plan Diagram map was wrong as it was not based on adopted 2004 Metro Plan Diagram, but rather on a version generated by Lane Council of Governments (LCOG) that was printed in a different manner than the official version. He thanked staff for their recommendation to remove the maps." "Mr. Kloos expressed concernthat it was not possible to access online an accurate copy, including site-specific amendments, of the official 2004 Metro Plan Diagram. He said maintaining an accurate Metro Plan Diagram that was accessible to the public was a long-standing problem. "In response to a question from Mr. Peterson, Ms. Davies said that removing the proposed Metro Plan Diagram from the proposed amendments meant that the 2004 adopted version would still be in effect." The matter then moved to the governing bodies. The October 30, 2014, Staff Report to the County Board confirmed removal of the Metro Plan Diagram from the plan amendment ordinance because staff had confirmed that the version of the Diagram Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 52