Should inconsistencies occur, the Metro Plan is the prevailing policy document. The process for <br />reviewing and adopting refinement plans is outlined in Chapter N. <br />Relationship to Lane County Rural Comprehensive Plan <br />The Plan Boundary s.ho,rNn on the Metro Plan Dta~~rant iC~ C17ap~e~ II is houndz~r~e5-af tl~v <br />~ r r - ire G- ~Y~ -wt adjacent to the boundaries of the Lane County Rural <br />Comprehensive Plan that surround the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. There is no <br />overlap between the boundaries of the Metro Plan and tlu+~f the Lane County Rural <br />Comprehensive Plan. Lane Code Chapter I i is applied is die aresbetween the UCY13 and [lie <br />Plan B6unL14U to implement the Metf-o Platt. - -T T <br />Adjustments to boundaries may occur in the future so that areas previously a part of one plan are <br />covered under another plan. These adjustments may occur using the Metro Plan review and <br />amendment procedures described in Chapter IV. <br />Relationship to Statewide Planning-Goals <br />As required by state law, the Metro Plan has been developed in accordance with the statewide <br />planning goals adopted by the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission <br />(LCDC). a~tl p~lishc d isnA1-1119 l; a onencleci through Tyr{res 1~~: These goals provide the <br />standards and set the framework for the planning programs of all governmental agencies and <br />bodies in the metropolitan area. The Metro Plan addresses each of the LCDC goals (as well as <br />local goals) and contains objectives and policies that aimed a ea i=~eco7l ply with the LCDC <br />goals. <br />Relationship to the Technical Su lenient and- Working <br />The Metro Plan iswas based on a work programs approved by the Metropolitan N- an Policy <br />Committee (MPC) and by the governing bodies of Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County after <br />review and hearings by the respective planning commissions (and MAPAC for the 1982 Metro <br />Plan .Based on these is-work programs, an inventoriesy, reviews, and analyseis of a number of <br />Metro Plan rek # elements arcaw-r-€ conducted. These included. population projections, land <br />use and housing (supply and demand), public facilities and setyices,uti-"Ie and natural assets <br />and constraints. <br />l~r~x~~ tk it ~ nt ~y is v; ~tRd-analysis; A set of working papers' was ere-developed for the <br />1982 Metro Plan that whic-h-describes the relevant issues and factors concerning each subject, <br />and from these analyses, findings were drawn. These findings, in turn, formed an important <br />3 The working papers are on file for public use in the Springfield, Lane County, and Eugene planning offices, and at <br />ba~a Coi~ixcl-ef~v~~ents LCOG. <br />I-6 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 120 <br />