25. Level of service (LOS) standards are a nationally accepted means for measuring the <br />performance of roadway facilities. LOS analysis methods are standardized through the <br />Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual. <br />26. The OHP establishes performance standards for all state highways in Oregon. OAR 660- <br />012-0015 requires coordination of transportation system plans with the state. <br />Policies <br />F.14 Address the mobility and safety needs of motorists, transit users, bicyclists, pedestrians, <br />and the needs of emergency vehicles when planning and constructing roadway system <br />improvements. <br />F.15 Motor vehicle level of service policy: <br />a.. Use motor vehicle level of service standards to maintain acceptable and reliable <br />performance on the roadway system. These standards shall be used for: <br />(1) Identifying capacity deficiencies on the roadway system. <br />(2) Evaluating the impacts on roadways of amendments to transportation <br />plans, acknowledged comprehensive plans and land-use regulations, <br />pursuant to the TPR (OAR 660-012-0060). <br />(3) Evaluating development applications for consistency with the land-use <br />regulations of the applicable local government jurisdiction. <br />b. Acceptable and reliable performance is defined by the following levels of service <br />under peak hour traffic conditions: LOS E within Eugene's Central Area <br />Transportation Study (CATS) area, and LOS D elsewhere. <br />G. Performance standards from the OHP shall be applied on state facilities in the <br />Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. <br />In some cases, the level of service on a facility may be substandard. The local <br />government jurisdiction may find that transportation system improvements to bring <br />performance up to standard within the planning horizon may not be feasible, and safety <br />will not be compromised, and broader community goals would be better served by <br />allowing a substandard level of service. The limitation on the feasibility of a <br />transportation system improvement may arise from severe constraints, including but not <br />limited to environmental conditions, lack of public agency financial resources, or land <br />use constraint factors. It is not the intent of TSI Roadway Policy #2: Motor Vehicle <br />Level of Service to require deferral of development in such cases. The intent is to defer <br />motor vehicle capacity increasing transportation system improvements until existing <br />constraints can be overcome or develop an alternative mix of strategies (such as: land <br />use measures, TDM, short-term safety improvements) to address the problem. <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) III-F-8 Page 220 <br />