Attachment C <br />9.8305 Auulicability. PUD provisions shall be applied when any of the following conditions <br />exist: <br />(1) The proposal is subject to review and approval through the PUD process <br />according to an adopted refinement plan, including but not limited to, property <br />within the boundary of the South Hills Study where all or a portion of a <br />development site is: <br />(a) Between an elevation of 500 feet and 701 feet, and the development site <br />is at least 4 acres with areas of the development site containing slopes <br />that exceed 20%. <br />(b) On property above 701 feet in elevation, except partitions that do not <br />include the creation of a public street, unless an alternate review <br />procedure is approved pursuant to EC 9.9630(3) (a). <br />(c) Above an elevation of 900 feet, except for a land division undertaken by <br />or on behalf of a governmental entity in order to preserve, manage, or <br />expand park, open space, or natural resource areas. <br />(2) The property is zoned with a /PD overlay zone. <br />(3) One or more land uses proposed for the site are subject to review and approval <br />through the PUD process according to the zoning. <br />(4) When requested by the property owner. <br />The subject property is within the South Hills Study boundary, so EC 9.8305(1) would apply. <br />6. Allowable Uses for Current Designation & Zone Versus Proposed <br />Public comment stated that it has not been made clear what the difference in allowable uses is between <br />the existing and proposed plan designation/zoning. The following includes examples of the types of uses <br />permitted under the existing and proposed plan designation/zoning for the portion of the property not in <br />or platted for cemetery use'. <br />Existing: <br />Proposed: <br />Use <br />plan designation Parks & Open Space <br />plan designation Low Density <br />zoning R-1 Low Density Residential <br />Residential <br />zoning R-1 Low Density Residential <br />Single-family <br />Not allowed because housing would be <br />Allowed because housing would be <br />detached <br />inconsistent with a Parks and Open Space <br />consistent with a Low Density Residential <br />housing <br />designation <br />Metro Plan designation <br />subdivision <br />Multi-family <br />Not allowed because it is only permitted <br />Allowed through a PUD because housing <br />housing <br />through a PUD which would require a <br />would be consistent with a Low Density <br />market rate <br />residential Metro Plan designation <br />Residential Metro Plan designation <br />Controlled <br />Allowed because current regulations do <br />Allowed because current regulations do <br />Income & <br />not require consideration of the Metro Plan <br />not require consideration of the Metro Plan <br />Rent (CIR) <br />designation. The allowable density range is <br />designation. The allowable density range is <br />Housing <br />higher for CIR housing; up to 150% of the <br />higher for CIR housing; up to 150% of the <br />maximum or u to 21 homes per net acre <br />maximum or u to 21 homes per net acre <br />Neighborhood <br />Not allowed because it is only permitted <br />Allowed through a PUD because a Low <br />Commercial <br />through a PUD which would require a <br />Density Residential Metro Plan designation <br />1 Technically, the existing zoning of the site is split PL Public Land and R-1 Low Density Residential. However, since <br />presumably the concern is about the undeveloped portion of the site (which is mostly POS designated and R-1 <br />zoned) an analysis of what is allowed in the PL zone is not included. Allowable uses and standards for PL zone can <br />be found beginning at Eugene Code 9.2680. The full list of uses allowed in R-1 is at EC Table 9.2740. <br />5 <br />PC Agenda - Page 23 <br />