My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Report: Planning Commission Deliberations 7-27-2015
>
OnTrack
>
MA
>
2015
>
MA 15-1
>
Staff Report: Planning Commission Deliberations 7-27-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2015 9:58:41 AM
Creation date
9/29/2015 8:33:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
MA
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
REST-HAVEN
Document Type
Staff Report
Document_Date
7/27/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />inventory must document the amount of buildable land in each residential plan designation." The <br />comprehensive plan map for the city is the Metro Plan land use diagram. The Residential Lands Study <br />(1999) was adopted by the City of Eugene as a refinement of the Metro Plan, and complies with the <br />requirements of Goal 10 and the corresponding Administrative Rule. According to the 1999 <br />Residential Lands Study (RLS), there is sufficient buildable residential land to meet the identified land <br />need. <br />The subject site is proposed to be re-designated to a residential designation. The RLS identifies the <br />undeveloped residential land supply (inventory) based on the designation or zoning and the size of <br />the parcel. Some demand was also assumed to be accommodated through redevelopment and infill. <br />This subject site was not identified as part of the RLS since although it was partially zoned R-1, it was <br />not in vacant or in agricultural or timber use at that time; therefore this re-designation does not <br />reduce the RLS inventory and is consistent with Goal 10. However, the proposal will add <br />approximately 46 acres of housing capacity to the existing land supply (excluding any protected area). <br />Based on the above, the amendments are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 10. <br />Goal 11- Public Facilities and Services. To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement <br />of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. <br />The amendments do not affect the City's provision of public facilities and services. Therefore, <br />Statewide Planning Goal 11 does not apply. <br />Goal 12- Transportation. To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation <br />system. <br />The Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) contains the following requirement: <br />(1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use <br />regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned <br />transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in <br />section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule. <br />A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it <br />would: <br />(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility <br />(exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); <br />(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or <br />(c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on <br />projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted <br />TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be <br />generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes <br />an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, <br />including, but not limited to, transportation demand management. This reduction may <br />diminish or completely eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. <br />(A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification <br />of an existing or planned transportation facility; <br />(8) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it <br />Findings - 5 <br />PC Agenda - Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.