PDF Page 33 <br />.i= <br />September d; 2013 <br />Eugene He arings.OFicial <br />cID: City of EUgege <br />Pldnning:and Development De,partme' nt <br />Planning Divis oh <br />99 truest 1Q"'AvnUE <br />gzpe; OR 9740.4 <br />R': LaU'MRldi p- PUD <br />File N.t*m6'rPRT 1:2=2- l'IA 12 G, SDf~ 12-5 a.nd_ 12,2 <br />rlppllcarit`s FinalArgu~en, <br />Dear Eugene Headngs Official" <br />P,ttached is the Applicant's Final ArO6rtt; As. you review'this-niater-W we ertcouraga you ta.~iosely <br />study the:entire appl cant pa!ckarge.. In order,.all of the moterfals subniitfed to. the: City ara in three <br />ca#?o4ries' <br />9. 'fhaappticant's faii'r~ipplicati n,s:ubrnltlal5 -~-Plann:ed taniC l~ plepmErnt Tentative. Stagt <br />(PDT 1 Z.2); TTafflc Impact Analysls (T IA 1276); Standardp, Rovlbw {SOR 12Y5), a;d Zona <br />Dtiarige ('12 2): theiudfng iririttonldteinnts; ehlbif$,. attachments and plan$e.t'and dated <br />;ftifd2~F, X0:13. <br />68 ' dn *S iirittal, tHatp tic ge 6f mdteria(dated AugU U8,:2.0t3~ bi t <br />submlt;?ed on A.ugus 23, 2d13, just after ~eeRiuing` ttQtaTfi repoft, <br />3. Ttie ppii an#'s Flea ing submit#al, that:,package of materaf dated .and submitted ak the <br />[i~'rlrig: orc August 28, 2i11:~;. . <br />we acl nawledge that jbia is a lot Qf hiai6 [A As tltitad at ilie :hearing, you are startlrig_ttifs r~vielsi. task <br />without a:pusitive Staff Report, which ritherrvhta would. have been -4 great Fesourcg in ratting ail apjiioval ' <br />ducisibn Hence; W Iiavq drafted this final a'rgume'nt in'tlie fashfon .a <br />,af Staff Report- If you are inclined. <br />I apProvetl i5, e,~i rythir you Hoed is iri th Final A;rgumert;'or to#erer is d to fhe record tlleceiri: <br />Typf€ally, even if the-sfaff repgmrnend.denial ofan applica{ion, th ydraft ~.ondifibris.ef ~pp~ovaI fhi, ase <br />ttia NO wants. to approve Tlia1 did not happar! hsre. 7hrfa ;wa hava.lncluiid, typical, recommended <br />conditions of`approval, pulled ivheta ~bssibla 666 a#ner PUD approval in the record, if you lid tha sC 0' <br />4e.wet6st d; wa w661d uialcorr,a tha.aApo*ri ty to i/bfk°vrith staff to ftrna up -`an agreed sol of <br />conditlons, ~''ur.taam hes..p$tisrice doing tht_ittth pas# vyitlfh crty <br />;1 .:yuu sfu y'thts mater ai, yea t,tight pe'qih.VA1 is the applicatlons their vas,. ir1, pat i Ular t}ta P <br />applicaUOn: lts Wrritdn tategnEnt is the most thorough and served as a. iaitnchh)g. &Ibt.foftha'.olh." t <br />t#ir e ppli tions and ttialr yvrlt#en staterileiits. The vrfdtten statdrnents provide a autistanfiial:arnauni of <br />Mai0a..1 fn partio.olar•whet the applicant refers tows fin&ho 1 support-oE llie pplicatlorr 7hase findings <br />are_e trerriely detail du Fbr exarnple,.:W< Qi° Ztaff:rafers tq.the: PUD purpvoe statement and.ciies. <br />congerris rgardirig, or ins#at1 <br />00, t_ree.pfeservatton O'd vlows.. you wail( find detail d'aVittan> e.tti f tha: <br />proposal do'QS ibdied:M-e et applka64 c,tt&ia (See PUD - kitten atatemerit, pdg-__ 9_ 3) t~itizra: iri iiigs <br />are.prosen( d:i nafratly format in t)ta written stafeti ecit; addiUohat eViderii cati`b'efound lh tha <br />eXtittitts atfaGhniaht5 a 1 .pEaps. in* particular, the plans cantaln & tail"s and spec' icaifons furfher <br />dbcrimeriting a4t¢ai ge iii c t pllanc v~lth applicable: crateria acid starid'a. <br />uppCartientirig the.applica#bris, ya~i'It riecf frtci the ProFleafg S~+bmitfal to be cUifa. <br />helpfuL Eaily on in #heirreview pbnesis} staff shared a.list of it]~iat coricorns that they <br />had !rilth 1h litopasail. (Pte-Hei ring Submittal,. ErhMt.0=0): ln° response, the aj3pllcanf <br />