ER-22 <br />1 densely-planted vegetation." Given that definition, we agree with Neighbors <br />2 that the planning commission's conclusion that open space along the eastern <br />3 boundary provides "adequate screening from' the adjacent park fails to give <br />4 meaning to the word "screening," where it does not require the PUD to be <br />S visually shielded or obscured from the adjacent park through any of the means <br />6 specified in the definition. The planning commission appears to have relied on <br />7 its conclusion that the proposed PUD is "reasonably compatible and <br />8 harmonious with" the adjacent park under EC 9.8320(13)(2009) to conclude <br />9 that no screening of the proposed PUD from the park is required. However, as <br />10 Neighbors point out, EC 9.8320(3) is concerned with screening the proposed <br />11 PUD from adjacent lands; it is not concerned with the views the PUD will have <br />12 of adjacent lands. While open space along the eastern boundary may be <br />13 compatible and harmonious with the adjacent park, open space does not screen <br />14 the PUD from view from the park. Accordingly, a portion of Neighbors' <br />15 second and third assignments of error are sustained. <br />16 2. Northern, Western, and Southern Boundaries <br />17 In portions of their second and third assignments of error, Neighbors <br />18 challenge the planning commission's conclusion that the PUD will be <br />19 adequately screened from the surrounding properties. to the north, west, and <br />20 south. The planning commission concluded that, with conditions of approval <br />21 requiring (1) landscaping along the northern property line in accordance with <br />22 Meadows' landscaping plan and outside of required setbacks, (2) vegetation as <br />23 proposed along the concrete wall on the western property line, and (3) <br />24 landscaping that satisfies the city's High Screen Landscaping Standard along <br />25 the south property line, screening along the north, west and south property lines <br />26 is adequate to satisfy EC 9.8320(3). Record 12-13. Neighbors do not <br />Page 22 <br />00007 <br />