My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (06)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (06)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2015 2:42:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
7/28/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
28 <br />9.6875; the only reference for what must meet the standards is in the opening <br />provision of the section, i.e., the "transportation systems" that are required of <br />the PUD. In other words, subsection (a) only tells us that the "transportation <br />systems" (whatever they are) must meet the City standards contained elsewhere <br />in the City's code. <br />Subsection (b) uses the same grammatical structure as subsection (a), but <br />it does not identify any standards. Instead, it identifies three specific <br />transportation elements (pedestrians, bicyclists and transit) that must be <br />analyzed for consistency with the standards when evaluating whether the PUD <br />provides "a safe and adequate transportation system": <br />"(b) Pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation, including related <br />facilities, as needed among buildings and related uses on the <br />development site, as well as to adjacent and nearby residential <br />areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, office parks, and <br />industrial parks, provided the city makes findings to demonstrate <br />consistency with constitutional requirements. `Nearby' means uses <br />within 1/4 mile that can reasonably be expected to be used by <br />pedestrians, and uses within 2 miles that can reasonably be <br />expected to be used by bicyclists." <br />In contrast to subsection (a), subsection (b) contains no standards. All it does is <br />identify elements of the transportation system that must be evaluated for <br />consistency with the standards in subsection (a). <br />Finally, subsection (c) adds additional considerations, but only "where <br />OCTOBER 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.