22 <br />of the street in order to ensure safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and <br />motorists traveling on Oakleigh Lane (a low-volume street), to <br />ensure the efficient provision of emergency services and to <br />guarantee that the proposed development and adjacent properties <br />are accessible via Oakleigh Lane. <br />There is a nexus between the requirement to dedicate 22.5 feet of <br />right-of-way through the drive aisle and to dedicate 13 feet of <br />right-of-way east of the drive aisle to the end of the proposed <br />turnaround and the public interest at issue. The 22.5 feet of right- <br />of-way will result in one-half of the 45 feet of right-of-way which <br />is necessary to construct Oakleigh Lane to the City's minimum <br />street design standards which have been established for a low- <br />volume street. The 13 feet of right-of-way will provide sufficient <br />right-of-way on the south side of the centerline to construct an <br />emergency vehicle turnaround with adjacent sidewalks to City <br />standards. Improving Oakleigh Lane to these standards will allow <br />for two-way vehicular and bicycle traffic, will provide separation <br />between vehicular traffic and pedestrians and will also provide for <br />emergency response and access to adjacent lots. Because 45 feet of <br />right-of-way is the minimum amount of right-of-way necessary to <br />construct Oakleigh Lane in this manner as a low-volume street, <br />and because 33 feet of right-of-way is the minimum amount of <br />right-of-way necessary to construct the turnaround at this location, <br />the public interest in safe vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle travel <br />and emergency response and access will be at risk if the 22.5 foot <br />and 13 foot strips of right-of-way are not dedicated. <br />{t* * * * * <br />"Without the additional right-of-way, Oakleigh Lane cannot be <br />improved to the City's minimum street design standards and the <br />168 new vehicle trips per day generated by the proposed <br />development, along with the additional pedestrian and bicycle <br />traffic generated by the proposed development will not be assured <br />of safe access via Oakleigh Lane." Rec p 1256-7 (emphasis <br />added). <br />In short, for the fifty-foot portion at the end of Oakleigh Lane, adjacent to the <br />OCTOBER 2014 <br />