9 <br />notice violated Goal One of the Statewide Planning Goals, which sets "citizen <br />participation" at all stages of the land use process as one of the cornerstone's of <br />the Oregon land use system. <br />Other affected neighbors ultimately appealed the City's decision to <br />LUBA on January 3, 2014, but no one provided Mr. Trautman with notice of <br />that appeal. LUBA Rec 880 - 82. Finally, in late January, the City discovered <br />it had mishandled the process and failed to provide notice to all of the <br />participants in the process below. This led the City to provide an additional <br />notice to several people who had not received notice on January 28, 2014. <br />Supp Rec p 6 - 8. Unfortunately, the City erred again and Mr. Trautman was <br />not one of those to whom the City sent that delayed notice. Finally, on <br />February 20, 2014, the Petitioner submitted a certificate of service to LUBA <br />that, for the first time, demonstrated that Mr. Trautman had received notice that <br />a decision had been made and that an appeal to LUBA had been filed. <br />The final notice prepared by the City specifically noted that an appeal <br />had been filed with LUBA and instructed interested parties that they could <br />intervene in that proceeding: <br />"A Notice of Intent to Appeal has already been filed with the <br />Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA).... Persons who <br />participated orally or in writing before the local government, and <br />who are receiving this notice, may file a motion to intervene in the <br />OCTOBER 2014 <br />