My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (06)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (06)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2015 2:42:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
7/28/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />CITY OF EUGENE <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S <br />OFFICE <br />125 E. 8" Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />Phone (541) 682-8447 <br />Fax (541) 682-5414 <br />LUBA also required Respondent to transmit a second supplemental record with a <br />staff PowerPoint presentation that had been omitted from the record, along with any <br />printed materials distributed to the planning commission (or identify the location in the <br />record where those items could be found). Or LUBA (LUBA No. 2014-001, <br />Order, May 1, 2014) slip op. 8. <br />Planning staff has reviewed the video of the December 3, 2013 planning <br />commission deliberations. The PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are included in <br />the second supplemental record at Item 1, was presented at this meeting.' Any documents <br />distributed to the planning commission at this December 3rd meeting were copies of items <br />already in the record. In most instances, planning staff merely located the actual <br />document from the record to display for the planning commission. For instance, during <br />deliberations on December 3`d, planning staff displayed the original site plans, Rec. Item <br />3Te (RE-Z, Al. 1); applicant's topographic survey map, Rec. Item 26 (RE-AC, 8x11 size <br />at RE-T, Attachment D-2); building elevations, Rec. Item 37.g (RE-AC, 8x11 size at <br />RE-T, Attachment D-1); and read aloud portions of the Public Works referral comments <br />(Rec. 1255-1276). Planning staff distributed color copies of the map found at Rec. 926 <br />(RE-K), and copies of Lane County referral comments found at Rec. 1313. <br />On December 15, 2013, the planning commission continued deliberations. <br />Planning staff distributed at this meeting copies of a draft final order, which is included in <br />the second supplemental record at Item 2. <br />DATED this 13th day of May, 2014 <br />Anne C. Davies, OSB #910149 <br />Of Attorneys for Respondent City of Eugene <br />The first page of the PowerPoint includes the wrong date - December 9, 2013. The date should <br />read December 3, 2013. <br />Page 2 - CITY'S RESPONSE TO MAY 1, 2014 ORDER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.