My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (05)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (05)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2015 2:35:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
7/28/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Specific measures for compliance with SFHA standards will be subject to further City review and <br />approval at the time of building permits. <br />Public Works staff does not concur with the applicant's floodplain delineation, but finds that it is <br />relatively accurate. Buildings 1, *2, 4, the northernmost garage, the northernmost bike shed, and the <br />bike barn are located entirely within the SFHA, whereas Buildings 3 and 7 are located partially within <br />the SFHA. Staff notes that the highest BFE shall be used for the entire development site, unless each <br />structure (including the bike barn) has a specific BFE determination that has been approved by City <br />staff. To ensure compliance with the applicable SFHA standards, the following condition of approval is <br />necessary: <br />• The.final site plan shall delineate the Special Flood Hazard Area, identify Base Flood <br />Elevation (for the entire site or for each building), and note that development of the site will <br />be required to comply with the standards at EC 9.6707 through EC 9.6709. <br />As conditioned, the development will comply with the applicable SFHA standards. <br />(d) EC 9.6710 Geological and Geotechnical Analysis., <br />The geotechnical analysis requirements beginning at EC 9.6710 apply because the proposed <br />development is a PUD that has slopes in excess of five percent. The applicant submitted a geotechnical <br />analysis prepared by Foundation Engineering, Inc. Public Works staff confirms that the applicant's <br />analysis meets the Level Three Analysis requirements of EC 9.6710(4)(c) and Administrative Order AO- <br />58-02-254. The analysis includes the results of sub-surface investigation and testing, to establish soil <br />types and distribution, and the characteristics of the site and soils, in relation to the proposed <br />development. The analysis includes design recommendations for construction. and inspection. <br />Public Works staff confirms that the analysis confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed <br />development and notes that the geotechnical recommendations are industry standards. Nevertheless, <br />to ensure compliance as proposed, the following condition of approval is necessary: <br />• The final PUD site plans shall note that construction permits shall conform to the applicant's <br />geotechnical analysis. <br />Based on the above findings and condition, the geotechnical standards at EC 9.6710 will be met. <br />(e) - EC 9.6730 Pedestrian Circulation On-Site. <br />The development meets these standards by providing pedestrian connections between the dwelling <br />units and common facilities. <br />(f) EC 9.6735 Public Access Required. <br />The development will have-access onto a public street, Oakleigh Lane, consistent with this <br />standard. Referral commentsfrom Public Works staff confirm that the other requirements of this <br />standard are also met. <br />Staff Report: Oakleigh Meadows Cohousing September 2013 Page 24 <br />HO Agenda - Page 31 1011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.