My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (04)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (04)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2015 2:26:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
7/28/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Page: 12 <br />Number: 1 Author: BTHOMS Subject: Sticky Note Date: 10/8/2013 1:50:32 PM <br />are wholly on TL 200 <br />7,Number: 2 Author: BTHOMS Subject: Sticky Note Date: 10/8/2013 1:53:39 PM <br />Flag lots are not the best utilization of the the vacant lot. A subdivision requiring 50 lineal feet of Oakleigh ROW frontage, is the best utilization <br />of TL 200. . <br />Number: 3 Author: BTHOMS Subject: Sticky Note Date: 10/8/2013 1:55:45 PM <br />It should not be approved because it diminishes the value available to TL 200. <br />.,,Number: 4 Author: BTHOMS Subject: Sticky Note Date: 10/8/2013 1:58:40 PM <br />There are only 23 residential lots and 20 existing units on Oakleigh and therefore it does not function as a low volume residential road. It <br />functions as an access way which is presumed to safely allow 2S0 ADT max. <br />721 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.