My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (03)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (03)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2015 2:17:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
7/28/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
borders and edges, and English Ivy, which is climbing up tree trunks, throttling and choking the life out of <br />them, and fruiting for birds to eat and disburse seeds through the rear end of their digestive tracts. The <br />design proposal should address removal of invasive plants while not disturbing important plants that are <br />stranded within the territories of the bad-mannered plants. The plan should further dictate future control <br />of reemergents after the development is completed. <br />PROPOSED USE OF "REMOVED" VEGETATION <br />So you're going to remove existing plants, huh? ('Ihe ones with the X's at the center of the plant, drawn <br />on the plans.) No Oregon White Oak saplings can be removed. You'll have to build around those. For <br />those native plants that are removed, there is no indication how it is to be removed or where it is going. <br />The assumption is that a trackhoe will rip it out and who cares; it will be disposed of'. Not in this <br />development. Native plants that must be removed are not merely X's. They will be respectfiilly treated. <br />They will be removed in such a way that they can be transplanted and thrive in their new location (root <br />wad, tap root, and surrounding soil undisturbed, proper season of removal). They will have a stockpile <br />area on-site that carefully preserves their vitality, and they will have a destination on-site that is . <br />appropriate for them. An example would be the California Incense Cedar saplings. You don't need <br />Arborvitae on this site; your Incense Cedars will be your natural hedge. Plant them 3' or 4' on center and <br />you'll have a fabulous evergreen wall that is perfectly appropriate for the site. <br />AUDIT OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PLANTS <br />For the planting plan, any cultured, non-native plants will need to be audited and approved. They can't <br />have bad manners and be invasive. We can't allow Norway Maple, Tree-of-heaven, Portuguese <br />Laurelcherry, and the like. These all spread, some even in the shade. We can't allow invasive ivies like <br />English Ivy, and some ornamental grasses and sedges are invasive, too. Plants like Japanese Maple, <br />Flowering Cherry, Hydrangea, and perennials like Coneflower, have better manners. These are okay. <br />But with turfgrass, there's an awful lot of water and labor, including mowing, edging, fertilization and <br />thatching. We might want to consider alternatives to lawn. The audit would help achieve a planting plan <br />that is harmonious with the aesthetic native nature of the site and blend with adjacent neighbors' <br />landscapes while being more responsible ecologically. <br />ANEMLA,L ANALYSIS <br />TERRESTRIAL, AVIAN, AQUATIC <br />For all native animals, especially those on-site that are rare and endangered, we need to accommodate <br />their continuation and thriving. We must consider their habitat needs and maintain this state on site. We <br />must understand their range, flow, and connective corridors and design accordingly. <br />HISTORICAL-CULTURAL ANALYSIS <br />KALAPUYA <br />There are layers of cultures that have existed here for thousands of years, and intersections of cultures. <br />We should carefully research and document these. We have ignored and mistreated our relations, the <br />Kalapuya. They have lived here for at least 10,000 years. We should invite Kalapuya Elders to this site <br />and receive their blessing. We should do an archeological study under the leadership and guidance of the <br />Kalapuya to make sure we are not disturbing any sacred areas. Our design should seek to honor the <br />Kalapuya. We should remember how they lived and still live, take a moment of silence and respect. <br />Even this simple orientation is a start and a good thing. We should be open-minded to whatever the <br />Elders tell us, even if it means to cease development. If they give the go-ahead, our design must at its <br />very least refer back to our findings and conclusions of the Kalapuya study, and we should be consciously <br />aware of its parameters while designing at every stage. This could be as simple as re-establishing a wet <br />meadow detention pond with a dominant composition of Great Camas and Common Camas. <br />Edges could incorporate a pod or two of Nootka Rose, which is a very important Kalapuya food. We <br />might be able to install a couple of'Colrigo Giant' Pacific Dogwood trees (resistant to anthrax). This <br />633 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.