proportional share of the future local improvement. The PC finds the traffic generation to be consistent <br />with-the proposed residential use, which is within the permissible density range. As such, the PC agrees <br />with the HO that the traffic generated by the development is not "significant" within the context of EC <br />9.8320:(12). <br />The PC finds that the various trip generation estimates provided in the record do not change the <br />determination that Oakleigh Lane is a low-volume residential street. The PC finds that the HO did not <br />err in his conclusions that relied on ADT estimates, and the relevance of this alleged error is unclear in <br />the appeal statement as it does not identify any related approval criteria to which the argument <br />applies. The HO findings on pages 18-29 are hereby incorporated by reference as further evidence of <br />compliance under the approval criterion appealed under this assignment of error. <br />The PC finds that the HO was correct in allowing the applicant's October 16, 2013 submittals into the <br />record, as they were responsive to evidence and argument submitted up to October 9, 2013, as <br />explained in the HO's decision. The PC also affirms the HO's Order Denying Reopening the Evidentiary <br />Record. The HO findings on pages 3-4 are hereby incorporated by reference as further evidence of the <br />open record appealed under this assignment of error. <br />IV. CONCLUSION <br />The Eugene Planning Commission has reviewed the record and the assignments of error in' the appeal, <br />and has voted to modify and affirm the decision of the Hearings Official to conditionally approve the <br />tentative PUD for Oakleigh Meadows Co-housing (PDT 13-1). Additional findings and modified <br />conditions of approval are provided in Section I I I ofthis -Final Order; the modified conditions of <br />approval are also included below for reference. All other conditions imposed by the Hearings Official <br />remain applicable as set out in the Hearings Official's decision. <br />Added Conditions of Approval: . <br />The final PUD plans shall show a building setback of 5 feet from the front property line along <br />the newly dedicated right-of-way boundary for Oakleigh Lane. A 10 foot setback shall be shown <br />along the remainder of the north property line, along the newly dedicated right-of-way for a <br />bike/pedestrian path. (See related Condition #3.) <br />The final PUD plans shall show landscaping along the north property line_consistent with the <br />applicant's proposed landscape plan (Sheet L2 of Exhibit PH-69), but moved south within the <br />required five foot setback outside of the newly dedicated right-of-way for Oakleigh Lane. The <br />applicant shall also revise the site plans to show landscaping that meets the City's L-2 standard <br />at EC 9.6210, along the remainder of the north property line, but without the requirement for <br />additional canopy trees. <br />Condition of Approval t#13 (as modified/replaced): <br />The final PUD plans shall show the applicant's proposal for "espaliered" trees along the outside <br />face of the proposed wall as a requirement. Plans shall also be revised to show a minimum 5- <br />foot.setback for the wall along the west and south boundaries of the site. The required <br />DRAFT Final Order Page 11 <br />113 <br />