My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (02)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (02)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2015 2:10:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
7/28/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
TAYLOR Becky G <br />•om: Jon Belcher <jbelcher@efn.org> <br />.'ent: Monday, November 25, 2013 1:14 PM <br />To: RANDALL William (SMTP); NYSTROM Steven A <br />Cc: DUNCAN Rick (SMTP); TAYLOR Becky G; *Eugene Planning Commissioners <br />Subject: RE: Oakleigh PUD Appeal <br />I.co-signed the appeal of the Hearing Official's decision on PDT-13-0001 as co-chair of River Road Community <br />organization after a nearly unanimous vote at our November general meeting to support either party should they <br />appeal. My signature could create the impression that I have a de-facto bias in this appeal. <br />More importantly I have worked with both parties on this issue as RRCO Co-Chair and it would take quite a bit of time <br />for me to share the information I have heard through those ex-parte contacts as well as from attending General and <br />Board meetingswhere Oakleigh Meadow Cohousing has been discussed, assuming I could remember all that I have <br />heard on this matter over the past two years. Additionally I am familiar with the site of the application. <br />For these reasons, I request time before the Commission to seek your advice on the appearance of partiality as required <br />by Article III, Section 6 and will then state my decision and the reasons therefore regarding abstaining from this hearing <br />and deliberation. I request that this occur at a Planning Commission meeting prior to the hearing or at the beginning of <br />the hearing, whichever is more appropriate. <br />Thank you, <br />Ion Belcher <br />arom: williamRANDALL.Finailto:bill@arborsouth.com] <br />!nt: Monday, November 25, 2013 11:47 AM <br />To: NYSTROM Steven A <br />Cc: DUNCAN Rick (SMTP); TAYLOR Becky G; *Eugene Planning Commissioners <br />Subject: Re: Oakleigh PUD Appeal <br />Sounds like a good idea. <br />Technically, Jon can abstain solely on his own, but he does need to seek the Commission's advice. (Article III, <br />Section 6). <br />I'll save lime for that on Dec 2. <br />WRANDALL <br />architect/senior principal/csba/leed ap bd+c <br />p: 541-344-3332 <br />380 Lincoln Street <br />.Eugene, Oregon 97401 - <br />please consider the environment before printing, this email <br />311 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.