My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (02)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (02)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2015 2:10:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
7/28/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
transportation should be provided by the applicant from the development site and to River Road. <br />The required right of way in this case should be required of the applicant for the entire stretch of <br />Oakleigh Lane as this is the true transportation impact that the development will have on <br />adjacent and nearby areas. <br />One hundred percent of existing local residents voiced opposition to this development <br />proposal so I was very disappointed to hear that the City approved of it. Those of us who are to <br />be directly impacted by this proposed development have very real concerns, and, none more <br />significant than safety. The HO's decision and staff report leave many essential questions <br />unanswered in regards to this issue. By failing to fully investigate the traffic impacts with the <br />required Traffic Impact Analysis or ensuring the safety to all by requiring the right of way to <br />include all of Oakleigh Ln, assumptions are being made in regards to traffic safety. The <br />consequences to poor planning in this case would prove to be detrimental to all involved. I urge <br />the planning commission to take a hard look at this issue and reject the development as proposed <br />due to, among the many other issues, insufficient traffic safety measures. <br />298 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.