sequence specified at the hearing, which specifically allowed responsive <br />testimony and evidence through October 16, 2013. Accordingly, this subsection <br />provides no basis for reversal or remand. <br />Conclusion <br />As set forth in each of the foregoing responses, the appellant has failed to <br />establish any error in the Hearings Official's decision warranting reversal or <br />remand of the same. Accordingly, the Planning Commission should deny this <br />appeal in its entirety. <br />Very truly yours, <br />HUTCHINSON, COX, COONS, <br />ORR & SHERLOCK, P. C. <br />r~ <br />G~ack P. Mittge <br />ZPM:ah <br />c: Client <br />14 <br />248 <br />