Eugene Planning Commission <br />December 5, 2013 <br />Page 4 <br />development. The record is devoid of such a showing and for good reason - a physical connection can <br />be made through the property to the north, tax lot 200, or the property to the south, tax lot 500. There <br />simply is no basis on which to grant an exception to the cul-de-sac length standard. <br />This project is an attempt to shoehorn inappropriate development in the wrong place. A co- <br />housing project may well make sense, but not one of this size at this spot. We urge the Planning <br />Commission to look at both the forest and the trees, because both of them support a denial of this <br />proposal. <br />Very truly yours, <br />William K. Kabeiseman <br />WKK:kms <br />PDX DOCS:510369.1 <br />234 <br />