My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (01)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (01)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2015 2:03:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
7/28/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />CITY OF EUGENE <br />CITY ATTORNEYS <br />OFFICE <br />125 E. a Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />Phone(541)682-6447 <br />Fax(541)602-5414 <br />argument that relies on it. <br />b. Undocumented Safety Issues <br />Although, as explained above, EC 9.8320(5) is satisfied where <br />subsections (a), (b) and (c) are complied with, the City did explicitly <br />conclude that there were no safety issues with the anticipated traffic <br />generated from the proposed PUD. <br />There are currently 25 residential tax lots along Oakleigh Lane <br />between River Road and the proposed PUD. Rec. 999. The proposal would <br />add an additional 29 dwelling units, which would result in over 500 trips per <br />day on Oakleigh Lane. Id. This number falls within the range expected for <br />low-volume streets. Id. The Hearings Official considered this expected <br />increase in traffic from the proposed development, and confirmed that the <br />Average Daily Traffic (ADT) would not be expected to exceed the ADT <br />range for low volume residential streets. Rec. 39. For low volume <br />residential public streets, the required dedicated right-of-way width ranges <br />from 45 feet to 55 feet.3 <br />Public Works staff recommended a condition of approval that would <br />3 The Public Works referral comments provide: <br />"Pursuant to EC 9.6870 when a street segment right-of-way width is <br />not designated on the adopted Street Right-of-Way map, the required <br />street width shall be the minimum width shown for its type in Table <br />9.6870 Right-of-Way and Paving Widths * * <br />"Oakleigh Lane, which is not identified on the adopted Street <br />Classification Map or the adopted Right-of Way Map * * * is a local <br />street. Staff concurs with the applicant's assessment on page 43 of the <br />written statement that Oakleigh Lane is a low-volume local street. <br /> <br />"Per Table 9.6870 the minimum right-of-way width for low-volume <br />streets is 45'." Rec. 1263-64. <br />Page 7 - BRIEF OF RESPONDENT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.