A <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />CITY OF EUGENE <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S <br />OFFICE <br />125 E. 8" Avenue <br />Eugena, OR 97401 <br />Phone(541)682-8447 <br />Fax(541)682-5414 <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />Page <br />1. PETITIONERS' STANDING 1 <br />11. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1 <br />A. Nature of the Land Use Decision 1 <br />B. Summary of Arguments 1 <br />C. Summary of Material Facts 1 <br />III. JURISDICTION 2 <br />IV. RESPONSE TO ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR 2 <br />A. Introduction 2 <br />B. Response to First Assignment of Error (Conte). 4 <br />1. Combined Response to First, Second and Third . <br />Subassignments of Error (I.A., 1.B., and l.C.) 4. <br />a. Motion to Strike 6 <br />b. Undocumented Safety Issues 7 <br />c, EC 9.8320(5)(a) Does Not Require Improvement <br />to City Street Standards Prior to Final PUD <br />Approval ........12 <br />d. The City's Determination That EC 9.8320(5)(B) <br />is Complied With is Supported by Substantial <br />Evidence . 13 <br />C. Condition Requiring Dedication of 22.5-Foot Strip <br />is Adequate to Demonstrate Compliance With <br />Approval Criteria 13 <br />2. Response to Fourth Sub Assignment of Error (1.D)...... 15 <br />3. Response to Fifth Sub Assignment of Error (l.E),........ 19 <br />4. Response to Sixth Sub Assignment of Error (1.F).... 20 <br />C. Response to Petitioners' Fourth Assignment of Error 20 <br />D. Response to Petitioners' First Assignment of Error 23 <br />I . Motion to Strike 23 <br />2. Net Density Calculation 23 <br />V. CONCLUSION .......:...........................................................................29 <br />1 <br />