19 <br />a hazard to public safety. 10 Petitioners cannot rely on an assumed violation of <br />the law to justify its unsupported theory that Oakleigh Lane will be unsafe.' 1 <br />III. CONCLUSION <br />LUBA correctly upheld the City's decision, and this Court should affirm <br />LUBA's decision. <br />Dated this 22nd day of October, 2014. <br />CITY OF EUGENE <br />By. - ~L, n 0,-AA <br />Anne C. Davies, OSB # 910149 <br />City Attorney's Office <br />125 E. 8th Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />Telephone: (541) 682-8447 <br />anne.c.davies@ci.eugene.or.us <br />Of Attorneys for Respondent <br />City of Eugene <br />law has been obeyed." OEC Rule 311(1)(x). <br />10 EC 5.255(1) provides: "Prohibited Stopping, Standing and Parking. <br />Except as authorized by a parking space rental permit issued in accordance with <br />section 5.350, no person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle in such a manner or <br />location that it constitutes a hazard to public safety or obstruction to vehicle, <br />bicycle or pedestrian traffic on the street." <br />11 Petitioners' Third Assignment of Error is premised on the false <br />assumption that all of Oakleigh Lane must be improved to full city standards in <br />order to make Oakleigh Lane safe. As explained in the foregoing discussion, <br />LUBA correctly affirmed the City's determination that no improvements to <br />Oakleigh Lane are currently required in order to make Oakleigh safe. The City <br />supports the applicant's arguments on this issue but does not address it <br />separately. <br />