My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (01)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
7-28-15 Trautman Public Comment (01)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2015 2:03:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
7/28/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
12 <br />There are currently 25 residential tax lots along Oakleigh Lane between <br />River Road and the proposed PUD. Local Rec. 999. The proposal would add <br />an additional 29 dwelling units, which would result in over 500 trips per day on <br />Oakleigh Lane. Id. This number falls within the range expected for low- <br />volume streets. Id. The Hearings Official considered this expected increase in <br />traffic from the proposed development, and confirmed that the Average Daily <br />Traffic (ADT) would not be expected to exceed the ADT range for low volume <br />residential streets. Local Rec. 39. For low volume residential public streets, the <br />required dedicated right-of-way width ranges from 45 feet to 55 feet.7 <br />Public Works staff recommended a condition of approval that would <br />require dedication of half of that width, "22.5' of right-of-way along the <br />northerly boundary of the development between the westerly boundary of the <br />proposed development and a line that is 50' east of the westerly boundary." <br />7 The Public Works referral comments provide: <br />"Pursuant to EC 9.6870, when a street segment right-of-way width <br />is not designated on the adopted Street Right-of-Way map, the <br />required street width shall be the minimum width shown for its <br />type in Table 9.6870 Right-of-Way and Paving Widths * * <br />"Oakleigh Lane, which is not identified on the adopted Street <br />Classification Map or the adopted Right-of Way Map * * * is a <br />local street. Staff concurs with the applicant's assessment on page <br />43 of the written statement that Oakleigh Lane is a low-volume <br />local street. * * * <br />"Per Table 9.6870 the minimum right-of-way width for low- <br />volume streets is 45'." Local Rec. 1263-64. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.