11 <br />Subassignment of Error 1.D 29 <br />The Decision failed to require a Traffic Impact Analysis as <br />required by EC 9.8320(5)(c) and EC 9.8670. <br />Subassignment of Error LE 33 <br />The Decision failed to adequately evaluate whether the PUD <br />would be a significant risk to public safety as required by <br />EC 9.8320(6). <br />Subassignment of Error 1.F 35 <br />The Decision did not properly evaluate the requirements of <br />EC 9.8320(11)(b) with respect to Oakleigh Lane. <br />SECOND ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR 44 <br />The City erred in finding that the proposed PUD would have <br />minimal off.-site impacts, as required by EC 9.8320(12). <br />THIRD ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR 48 <br />The City erred in finding that the proposed PUD would be <br />reasonably compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby <br />land uses, as required by EC 9.8320(13). <br />V. CONCLUSION 50 <br />EXHIBIT A. OAKLEIGH LANE RIGHT-OF-WAY SEGMENTS <br />EXHIBIT B. EUGENE LOCAL STREET STANDARDS <br />