My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LUBA Materials Volume 3 of 3
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
LUBA Materials Volume 3 of 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:35 PM
Creation date
7/21/2015 11:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
LUBA Materials
Document_Date
1/20/2014
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
485
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regardless, the dedication of a Public Accessway will ensure that the bike path can be <br />constructed in the future. Therefore, per the findings at EC 9.6805, which is incorporated herein <br />by reference, as a condition of approval, the applicant shall be required to dedicate a 13' public <br />accessway from the end of the proposed turnaround to the easterly property boundary. <br />Based on these findings, the proposed development complies with this standard. <br />EC 9.6840 Reserve Strips <br />Since access beyond the end of the existing terminus of Oakleigh Lane is not currently <br />controlled by a reserve strip, a reserve strip placed along the margin of the required dedication <br />would not serve to prevent access to adjacent properties; therefore there is no requirement for <br />a reserve strip. <br />EC 9.6845 Special Safety Requirements <br />There are no special safety requirements necessary to discourage use of the streets by non- <br />local motor vehicle traffic. <br />EC 9.6850 Street Classification Map <br />The proposal complies with this standard as discussed in EC9.6870 Street Width, which is <br />incorporated herein by reference. <br />EC 9.6855 Street Names <br />This standard does not apply as there are no new streets. <br />EC 9.6860 Street Right-of-Way Map <br />The proposal does not amend the right-of-way map. This criterion is not applicable. <br />EC 9.6870 Street Width <br />Pursuant to EC 9.6870, when a street segment right-of-way width is not designated on the adopted <br />Street Right-of-Way map, the required street width shall be the minimum width shown for its type <br />in Table 9.6870 Right-of-Way and Paving Widths, although a greater width can be required based <br />on adopted. plans and policies, adopted.Design Standards and Guidelines for Eugene Streets, <br />Sidewalks, Bikeways and Accessways or other factors which in the. judgment of the planning and <br />public works director necessitate a greater street width. <br />PDT13-01 Oakleigh Cohousing <br />Page 9 of 22 <br />1263 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.